The Origin of God @ WebNV

Wester said

Wester [ guest ] — Thu, 30 Aug 2007 10:59:53 EDT

"God" is just a word, which, indeed, could be chalked up to a phrase based on human limitation. The same thing can be said in regards to the parameters of certain things like 'normal', 'reality', 'time', 'existence', 'color', 'right', 'wrong', 'movies and videogames' (the former being a rather greedy and prodigious industry that seems to coin and garner nothing more than attention now adays - people seem to watch anything that's "exciting" and "awesome" no matter how good it is, but I suppose it could be seen for what it is when all is said and done - a commercial enterprise) and other ironic cycles. It could be the crude matter that hides the sublime nature of our noncorporeal bodies underneath.
That aside, humans created God. Very. Rudimentary. Logic to apply. :-P But the one who made "life" reach fruition is an answer that is a lot more complex than an answer. is the surmising I've come to in my contemplation. "God" has to be a lot more complex than "God", and the bitter irony is that I'm using the rudiments of these words to convey something words cannot. It's just that we aren't going to "know" this in this sense of 'time" and "life". But there are many who don't care, with no offense intended, and would rather just feel simple things. Hence that so many cop out for easy solutions.

But, again, this is all just my own construing. Feel free to carry on. You're making a valid point. :-)

Steve Alexander said

Steve Alexander [ guest ] — Wed, 29 Aug 2007 08:19:53 EDT

That wasn't the way I read them. Both were intelligent responses and if anything that they would provoke would be more conversation and discussion which is what I thought the purpose of the blog was. You know my stance and I think Harold is probably one of the most intelligent and learned people I have ever met. Anyways, I love you Jenny. :)
Dad

Jen said

Jen [ guest ] — Tue, 28 Aug 2007 08:09:44 EDT

Maybe their comments were deleted because they weren't meant to make a logical point or statement, but rather simply to provoke an impulsive response from those who read their comments.

Steve Alexander said

Steve Alexander [ guest ] — Tue, 28 Aug 2007 03:03:23 EDT

I just read this. Why were rack and Harold's comments deleted? I found them interesting?

Nick Villescas said

Nick Villescas [ author ] — Wed, 22 Aug 2007 18:50:16 EDT

Glad I could share it with you David. I've always liked Douglas Adams since he's a technologist.

As for rack and Harold, I've deleted your comments and will do so to any others in the future.

david said

david [ guest ] — Tue, 21 Aug 2007 18:04:41 EDT

I'm rather partial to Douglas Adams, but I'd never seen this. So, thank for sharing it even if it is old.

It is, as all things Adams did, simultaneous silly and serious. I always liked that combination.